This is a very different book from the ones I usually see from CSIRO Publishing. Huge thanks for my review copy.
- Police should be allowed to use robots in public places if it helps keep people safe.
- Robots should be allowed to enter private land or homes during emergencies, such as bushfires or floods, without asking first.
- It is okay for robots like Reef Sweeper to kill invasive animals if it helps protect native species.
- Robots should replace humans in very dangerous jobs, even if it means some people lose their jobs.
- Drones and robots should be allowed to watch animals and people from above if it helps scientists collect important information.
- Medical robots should be allowed to work inside the human body if they can treat people faster and more safely than doctors alone.
- Robots should be used in war if it means fewer human soldiers are harmed.
- Robots that collect information (photos, sounds or data) should always ask for permission first, even in emergencies.
- If a robot makes a mistake and causes harm, the people who designed it should be responsible.
- Robots should only be used to help humans and the environment, not to make money or gain power
Robot Responders contains ethical questions for further discussion. I have selected a few and if I was sharing this book in my school library (senior Primary level and High School) I would copy some of the questions and then link them with a suggested fiction title. I do enjoy fiction middle grade books that feature robots so I have quite a few I can suggest which you can link with this nonfiction title.
Roboethics "Some (people) think we'll see robots in every kind of industry. Others would like to see stricter rules and regulations put in place now."
Privacy paw-trol "Imagine if your pet could remember everything it sees and hears. While that sounds super cool, it also means we need to think about privacy ... What rules should be in place to protect information we don't want to share?"
When is it too risky for humans? "Robots can go places that are too dangerous for humans, such as deep under the ocean or far into space. Do you think that's necessary? What do we gain - or lose - when we send a robot instead of a human being."
Who is in charge? "Should robots always obey the commands of their human partners? Or are there some situations where a robot should act based in its own judgement?"
Friends or machines? "Some people think that as robots become more lifelike and useful, they should have certain rights similar to humans or animals. Others believe that since they are human creations and don't have feelings, robots shouldn't have rights."











No comments:
Post a Comment